Brecht

Today we made a scene using brechtian techniques to try and understand the way an actor would feel when trying to maintain the epic theatre. I found the task quite difficult as my techinque was a form of questioning where the audience can ask me as an actor about my own character. This technique although useful to portray the character to the audience, is extremely difficult from the standpoint of the actor.

Overall, I don't think I would like to implement these into my other pieces of performance as it increases the pressure on the actor to know their character. 

Brecht

Today we looked at brecht and his style of theatre, and how it contrasted with Stanislavsky's own style and teaching. We looked at trying out his methods and techniques to have a better understanding. We created a scene using naturalistic movements and Stanislavsky's style of naturalism. We then created a new scene using Brecht's audience involvement techniques. The video shows this in action

I personally enjoy Brecht's techniques of making the audience a part of the performance as it allows me to easily create and portray a message that would be much harder to communicate using Stanislavsky's techniques. This means that for me I would definitely try and use Brecht's breaking of the fourth wall to keep the audiences on their toes and try and get them to be involved.

Stanislavski

Today we looked at doing a number of workshops to attempt to try and teach each other the different pieces of his work. I looked at using circles of attention to try and look at his attention to detail in terms of actors understanding and sensing themselves as well as their surroundings. This is important as an actor as it can give a believable performance to an audience if the actors and their characters look and focus on different aspects of their surroundings based on their circumstances. 

By putting a large amount of detail into a character, giving them other unrelated circumstances that perhaps will affect the character, offers an insight into that characters back story that the audience can pick up on and use. This is one of the elements that I will adopt into when i create characters as I believe that the added amount of detail can open up the characters to the audience in a way that allows them to relate better or at least feel like the characters are actually believable. 

Lee looked at purpose, and his activity involved having someone enter a room with a specific purpose to influence how that character would interact with the set. I quite liked this element and plan to implement it into my character development as it makes it extremely believable for an audience to see elements of the purpose within the movements and actions of the characters. 

However, Stanislavsky's attention to detail also involved fleshing out the characters more by getting actors to practice by shadowing a person in the room, to copy their movements and mannerisms directly. This is an element i find extremely challenging and don't plan on implementing it into my own acting and character development. Although it does allow for an actor to base his acting on a given root allowing him to better understand his character, I find it quite challenging and will not be attempting to use it in my own acting.

Later that week we had another workshop with other elements of Stanislavsky's work. I found Sahitya's workshop on looking at "the Magic If" to be interesting. It looked at putting the characters into situations to see how they would react. I personally do not find this an effective technique as it requires a good understanding of the character beforehand. 

However, Naz's workshop on looking at questions that characters must ask themselves is very interesting in exploring characters and what they think about their own situation, themselves and other people. This technique is extremely difficult to do, however if done right can give a lot of details of the character for the actor to think about and implement into his character development.

Overall, some of Stanislavsky's work is extremely useful and I will implement it into my own acting and character development, however not all of his elements and attention to detail are as relevant to me and what the amount of detail I would like to put in to my characters and to how naturalistic I would like to be as a character or as a director.

Stanislavski

During the two lessons on Stanislavski we looked at his context, features, and impact on modern theatre and acting. Stanislavski has very revolutionary ideas, for his time, regarding the importance of actors, script and charecter. This was very interesting to think about in terms of how a charecter can be defined or played by an actor. This made me think about the way i play charecatre sureing my performances and think about how I could improve for the future. This changed the way I thought about playing charecters and how much effort must go into each one to remove myself and my personality from the characters.

Although I have taken many elements of Stanislavski's methods into consideration, especially those regarding his attention to detail, I personally do not like stanislavski's focus on removing the actor from the charecter and his focus on naturalistic theatre, as it does not allow for any symbolism or metaphorical elements.